Spirituality: the current contender for all-time, grade-A, prime-cut bullshit

Depak Chopra is at it again. You’ve got to love empty tautologies like this:

“This domain of awareness is a core consciousness that is beyond our mind, intellect, and ego.”

There is no awareness beyond mind, intellect, and ego.

“When we have even a partial glimpse of this level of awareness we experience joy, insight, intuition, creativity, and freedom of choice. In addition, there is the awakening of love, kindness, compassion, happiness at the success of others, and equanimity.”

So, if I can achieve an undefinable “core consciousness”, everything will be sweetness and light, and all the world’s ills will dissolve into cotton candy and pastel-colored cute ponies.

What a load of empty, meaningless crap. It’s not on the level of Christian bullshit (the all-time winner), but it gets a B- for effort.

In celebration of freedom of speech

In celebration of Pharyngula’s recent post, here is a pictorial version of Muhammed:

If Muslims have a problem with this depiction of their prophet’s image, it is their problem, not mine. (See the site linked above for images that really would send them into orbit.)

There are damned few wingnut fundies of any flavor that get this. If you don’t like what you see, look somewhere else, or turn off the TV, or don’t watch the movie.

Published in: on 28 February 2010 at 11:47  Comments (5)  
Tags: , ,

Rerun: who’s responsible?

Some thoughts about you, the electorate, and our current American political system, from V for Vendetta:

“It’s no good blaming the drop in work standards upon bad management, either, though to be sure, the management is very bad. In fact, let us not mince words. The management is terrible.

“We’ve had a string of embezzlers, frauds, liars, and lunatics making a string of catastrophic decisions. This is plain fact.

“But who elected them? It was you! You who appointed these people! You who gave them the power to make your decisions for you!

“While I admit that anyone can make a mistake once, to go on making the same lethal error century after century seems to me nothing short of deliberate.

“You have encouraged these malicious incompetents, who have made your working life a shambles. You have accepted without question their senseless orders. You have allowed them to fill your workspace with dangerous and unproven machines.

“You could have stopped them. All you had to do is say ‘No!’

“You have no spine. You have no pride.”

Published in: on 28 February 2010 at 9:11  Comments (2)  
Tags: , ,

Definite proof that God supports gay marriage

Hawaii allows gay people to get married.

Hawaii dodged a potentially disasterous tsunami from this morning’s 8.8 earthquake off the Chilean coast.

Therefore, God supports gay marriage.

Right?

Published in: on 27 February 2010 at 18:51  Comments (3)  
Tags: , , ,

Some parents deserve nothing less than a horsewhipping

Not all child abuse takes the form of violence. Sometimes religious beliefs trump common sense and any sort of parental responsibility.

Osteomyelitis, fused joints, and an eventual amputation–Liz Heywood’s parents were devout Christian Scientists

Five days of excruciating pain and screaming before Robyn Twitchell died of peritonitis and twisted bowels. Christian Science strikes again.

Harrison Johnson was stung 432 times by wasps. His parents, members of The Fellowship (which believes medical science to be witchcraft) allowed him to die with his lungs filled with fluid and without medical care.

Someone should do the Jane Austen to Mary Baker Eddy‘s body.

The cat takes its owner for a walk

Published in: on 26 February 2010 at 15:50  Comments (1)  
Tags: , ,

Snake oil, anyone?

Very interesting graphic, derived from data from the Cochrane Collaboration.

(Click on the graphic to go to the full-sized image.)

Published in: on 26 February 2010 at 14:52  Leave a Comment  
Tags: , , ,

“Moral” judgements at Citibank

UPDATE 1 March 2010: fabulis reports that Citibank has announced a change in their policies in light of the screw-up caused by a nameless compliance officer for the company. Yay!

~~~

Let’s say you create a start-up business that specializes in travel services for homosexual men. You raise $600K to start, and create a web site called fabulis to advertise and bring business in.

You create a forum for discussions about what the business will offer, and you invite those who sign up early to upload videos to describe why the sender “is fabulis”. Content is purposely kept at the PG-rated level.

All sounds on the up-and-up, right?

Not according to Citibank. fabulis’ accounts were “frozen due to ‘objectionable content’ found on its website”. Figuring out why Citibank employees thought it appropriate to do so is left as an exercise for the student.

After the publicity storm hit the Internet, Citibank backed off, thawed the account, and issued a “good and sincere apology”.

That might have been the end of the issue, if it weren’t for the fact that Citibank has done that sort of thing before with an underwear-selling company. The owner of Sillyunderwear was told

“we typically decline accounts associated with content that the general public may potentially find inappropriate or offensive”

Question: offensive to whom? Why is men’s underwear or a gay travel service inappropriate?

And, more importantly, why does Citibank even think it is in a position to pass moral judgment on the transactions of legitimate businesses?

What makes moral people moral?

I found a post today that points at various people in history that “broke the rules and made for perfect role models”. That got me to thinking:

What makes someone a truly moral person? Standing up to The Man? Sticking with your moral guns in the face of public condemnation? Having a personal moral code that matches your public moral code?

If you accept all three, let’s review some of the choices made in the post:

Muhammed Ali (aka Cassius Clay)

WIN. He chose not only to resist the Vietnam draft, but did not flee or hide. He stood up tall and took his lumps–lost his livelihood and title, and went to jail to boot.

The Dalai Lama

FAIL. The descendent of the traditional leaders of Tibet spends others’ money freely in his global quest to free Tibet from Chinese control. What he doesn’t say loudly is that he wants to go back to the old ways in Tibet, which was the poorest country on earth per capita, while the lama class lived in splendor in palaces in the capital Lhasa. Nice gig, and he wants it back.

Mohandas Gandhi

FAIL. He led his country to freedom from British imperialism and practically invented the concept of civil disobedience–certainly a moral alternative to being killed when fighting overwhelmingly powerful adversaries. However, he later abused his privilege, his wife, and numerous young girls to quench his sexual appetite.

J. Robert Oppenheimer

WIN. He ran the Manhattan Project (managing a lot of independent scientists and engineers who resisted being managed), saw the horrific moral implications of what the Project had done, and made his views public. This got him fired, his secret clearances revoked, and forced him to make a living as a cattle rancher. (He later established the San Francisco Exploratorium.) He stuck by his moral guns.

Edward R. Murrow

WIN. Journalist and anchor for CBS News in the ’40s and ’50s, he was famous for his signature signoff line that he used during his broadcasts from London during the Blitz: “Good night, and good luck”. He went after Joe McCarthy and the Red Scare, despite what that fight cost him professionally and personally. He was known around the world for someone who told the truth, however unpopular it might be.

Oskar Schindler

WIN. Schindler was a German industrialist who was first motivated by money to use slave Jewish labor in his factories. But when he came to the moral realization of what Nazi Germany was doing to the Jews, he began to shelter them, even to his own political detriment and personal cost. Today there are descendants of those he saved from the gas chambers who declare that they are “a Schindler Jew”.

The next mindless beauty queen zombie

Miss Beverly Hills Lauren Ashley--looking good for a member of the religious undead

I guess Carrie Prejean’s lesson didn’t take. Here Miss Ashley opines:

“The Bible says that marriage is between a man and a woman. In Leviticus it says, ‘If man lies with mankind as he would lie with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination. They shall surely be put to death and their blood shall be upon them.’ The Bible is pretty black and white…I feel like God himself created mankind and he loves everyone, and he has the best for everyone. If he says that having sex with someone of your same gender is going to bring death upon you, that’s a pretty stern warning, and he knows more than we do about life.”

Oh, but she has lots of gay friends, and they’re okay.

I can hardly wait for someone to out the explicit emails and/or the sex tapes she likely made when she was “young and misguided”.

You can have your iPorn, as long as Apple approves of it

So this is no good, kaput, banished

Apple recently banished a shitload of iPhone apps that featured sexual content, nudity and semi-nudity (bikinis, lingerie, etc.)

…but Playboy images, FHM cheesecake, and Sports Illustrated swimware apps featuring sexual content, nudity, and semi-nudity (bikinis, lingerie, etc.) are just fine, thank you very much.

(I haven’t heard anything concerning complaints about the myriad written porn apps that are available for the iPhone, but then most knockwurst-heads that must have their pornulated content mobile don’t read all that well anyway.)

But *this* is okay, thank you very much

Where the *hell* were the parents during all this??

471 counts. 100+ children.

Why would a parent leave her/his child alone with an adult for any length of time???

Published in: on 23 February 2010 at 14:55  Comments (8)  
Tags: , , ,

Apples and oranges, apples and oranges

The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) is whining that the suicide airplane crash of Joseph Stack into the building housing the Austin, Texas, IRS office should have been classified as a terrorist attack.

CAIR further claims that Stack’s action would have been deemed a terrorist attack had he been Muslim.

Ahem.

A clue here. Stack did his heinous, misdirected deed on his own, without conspiracy or accomplices. The purpose of anti-terrorist investigation is to prevent efforts at death and destruction involving groups of perpetrators and their abettors who intend to terrorize; it is not to stop lone protesting wackadoodles who cannot pay their taxes properly and claim that violence “is the only solution”.  Dr. Asimov would disagree.

Fun with Mark Twain

“If you pick up a starving dog and make him prosperous, he will not bite you. This is the principal difference between a dog and a man.”

–Mark Twain, Pudd’nhead Wilson

Never let it be said that good deeds goes unpunished.

Published in: on 22 February 2010 at 11:02  Comments (1)  
Tags: , ,

Fun time with Ron Paul

Ron Paul belongs to that group of libertarians that Ayn Rand called “hippies of the right”–arch-conservatives who nonetheless dreamed of an anarchic America rather than a collective one.

Mr. Paul has been “blessed” (if that’s the word for it) by a straw poll held by the recent CPAC convention. The poll showed that a plurality of 31% of the conventioneers wanted Ron Paul to run for the presidency in 2012, ahead of the likes of Mitt “Waffles” Romney, Sarah “I never saw a job I didn’t want to quit halfway through during” Palin, and Minnesota governor Tim “completely clueless” Pawlenty.

However, one needs to consider material that was published with Mr. Paul’s blessings. Including in his rantings were such 1992 delicacies as:

“Order was only restored in L.A. when it came time for the blacks to pick up their welfare checks three days after rioting began…”–in reference to the LA race riots in 1992 in response to Rodney King’s attackers being acquitted in court

and

“’I’ve urged everyone in my family to know how to use a gun in self defense. For the animals are coming.”– in reference to white urban dwellers facing “uppity blacks”

These are lovely thoughts, I am sure, especially to those wingnut wackadoodles that attend CPAC conventions.